🔗 Share this article

The disputed, US and Israel-backed Gaza relief foundation declares it is winding down its humanitarian work in the Gaza region, following nearly half a year.

The foundation had previously halted its multiple aid distribution centers in Gaza following the truce agreement between Hamas and Israel came into force in recent weeks.

The organization attempted to circumvent United Nations channels as the main supplier of relief to Palestinian residents.

UN and other aid agencies declined to participate with its system, saying it was questionable and hazardous.

Hundreds of Palestinians were fatally wounded while trying to acquire nourishment amid chaotic scenes near GHF's sites, mostly by Israeli fire, according to the UN.

Israel said its soldiers fired alerting fire.

Operation Conclusion

The GHF said on the beginning of the week that it was winding down operations now because of the "effective conclusion of its humanitarian effort", with a cumulative three million shipments containing the corresponding to over 187 million food portions provided to residents.

The organization's top administrator, the executive director, also said the American-directed Civil-Military Coordination Center - which has been established to help execute the American administration's Gaza initiative - would be "taking over and developing the approach the organization demonstrated".

"The foundation's approach, in which Palestinian factions were unable to divert and benefit from humanitarian assistance, had major impact in getting Hamas to the table and securing a halt in hostilities."

Comments and Positions

The Palestinian faction - which refutes aid diversion claims - welcomed the closure of the GHF, based on information.

A representative of said the foundation should be made responsible for the harm it caused to local residents.

"We urge all international human rights organisations to guarantee that responsibility is assigned after resulting in fatalities and harm of thousands of Gazans and obscuring the nutritional restriction approach employed by the Israeli government."

Operational Background

The organization commenced activities in Gaza on 26 May, a seven days following the Israeli government had moderately reduced a complete restriction on humanitarian and trade shipments to Gaza that persisted for nearly three months and led to substantial deficiencies of necessary provisions.

Subsequently, a nutritional emergency was proclaimed in Gaza City.

The foundation's nourishment distribution centers in the southern and middle regions of Gaza were managed by United States-based protection companies and situated within areas controlled by Israeli forces.

Humanitarian Concerns

International organizations and their affiliates claimed the approach violated the basic relief guidelines of neutrality, impartiality and independence, and that channelling desperate people into militarised zones was fundamentally dangerous.

The UN's human rights office reported it tracked the killing of at least 859 Palestinians trying to acquire sustenance in the area surrounding organization centers between spring and summer months.

An additional 514 individuals were killed near the paths taken by United Nations and additional relief shipments, it further stated.

Most of them were fatally wounded by the Israeli military, as per the organization's documentation.

Divergent Narratives

The Israeli military claimed its soldiers had released alerting fire at individuals who came near them in a "intimidating" manner.

The foundation stated there were no firearm incidents at the distribution centers and alleged that United Nations of using "untrue and confusing" statistics from the Palestinian health authority administered by Hamas.

Future Implications

The foundation's prospects had been unclear since Palestinian factions and Israeli authorities consented a halt in hostilities arrangement to execute the initial stage of the United States' reconciliation proposal.

It said humanitarian assistance would take place "without interference from the both sides through the international bodies and their affiliates, and the humanitarian medical organization, in conjunction with other international institutions not connected in any way" with militant groups and the Israeli government.

International organization official the UN spokesman said on Monday that the foundation's closure would have "no influence" on its work "since we never collaborated with them".

The spokesperson additionally stated that while increased relief was entering the region since the ceasefire took effect on 10 October, it was "insufficient to meet all the needs" of the over two million inhabitants.